Current:Home > MarketsSome leading robot makers are pledging not to weaponize them -LondonCapital
Some leading robot makers are pledging not to weaponize them
View
Date:2025-04-23 06:55:26
Boston Dynamics and five other robotics companies have signed an open letter saying what many of us were already nervously hoping for anyway: Let's not weaponize general-purpose robots.
The six leading tech firms — including Agility Robotics, ANYbotics, Clearpath Robotics, Open Robotics and Unitree — say advanced robots could result in huge benefits in our work and home lives but that they may also be used for nefarious purposes.
"Untrustworthy people could use them to invade civil rights or to threaten, harm, or intimidate others," the companies said.
"We believe that adding weapons to robots that are remotely or autonomously operated, widely available to the public, and capable of navigating to previously inaccessible locations where people live and work, raises new risks of harm and serious ethical issues," they added.
The firms pledged not to weaponize their "advanced-mobility general-purpose robots" or the software that makes them function. They also said they would try to make sure their customers didn't weaponize the companies' products.
They companies said they don't take issue with "existing technologies" that governments use to "defend themselves and uphold their laws."
According to Boston Dynamics' website, police and fire departments are using the company's dog-like robot Spot to assess risky situations, but the firm says Spot is not designed for surveillance or to replace police officers.
There have been growing calls across the globe to curb the use of autonomous weapons systems — which operate on their own and don't involve a human operator — and the Stop Killer Robots campaign says nearly 100 countries and a majority of people oppose autonomous weapons.
But a meeting of the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons last year failed to reach a consensus governing the use of so-called killer robots, due in part to objections from countries working on such technologies including the U.S, the UK and Russia, CNBC reported.
veryGood! (6798)
Related
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Editors' picks: Our best global photos of 2022 range from heart-rending to hopeful
- Here's How North West and Kim Kardashian Supported Tristan Thompson at a Lakers Game
- Natural Climate Solutions Could Cancel Out a Fifth of U.S. Emissions, Study Finds
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Michael Bloomberg on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
- The FDA finalizes rule expanding the availability of abortion pills
- This It Cosmetics Balm Works as a Cleanser, Makeup Remover, and Mask: Get 2 for Less Than the Price of 1
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- The sports world is still built for men. This elite runner wants to change that
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- China Wins Approval for Giant Dam Project in World Heritage Site
- Illinois becomes first state in U.S. to outlaw book bans in libraries: Regimes ban books, not democracies
- Michigan County Embraces Giant Wind Farms, Bucking a Trend
- Sonya Massey's father decries possible release of former deputy charged with her death
- With less access to paid leave, rural workers face hard choices about health, family
- China Wins Approval for Giant Dam Project in World Heritage Site
- In praise of being late: The upside of spurning the clock
Recommendation
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Tom Steyer on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
Instant Brands — maker of the Instant Pot — files for bankruptcy
Why Scheana Shay Has Been Hard On Herself Amid Vanderpump Rules Drama
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp warns GOP not to get bogged down in Trump indictment
Farmers, Don’t Count on Technology to Protect Agriculture from Climate Change
Chicago West Hilariously Calls Out Kim Kardashian’s Cooking in Mother’s Day Card